<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video on Flickr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sarahatwood.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/video-on-flickr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sarahatwood.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/video-on-flickr/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:21:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: missbhavens</title>
		<link>http://sarahatwood.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/video-on-flickr/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>missbhavens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarahatwood.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-105</guid>
		<description>I dunno. I&#039;m a huge Flickr fan. It never occurred to me that they&#039;d host video there.  I know people are concerned (overly, really) that Flickr will devolve into a YouTubish online video nightmare, but I truly see the video as a complimentary service. 90 seconds is diddly, really. And because Flickr is so photocentric, I think its users will simply utilize the lame-o &quot;movie&quot; features on their still cameras for quickie moments.  Moving snapshots, literally. Video doodles. Jen Proctor calls them &lt;a href=&quot;http://snipurl.com/25qhb  [www_flickr_com]&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Voodles&lt;/a&gt;.

I say &quot;Yay, voodles!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno. I&#8217;m a huge Flickr fan. It never occurred to me that they&#8217;d host video there.  I know people are concerned (overly, really) that Flickr will devolve into a YouTubish online video nightmare, but I truly see the video as a complimentary service. 90 seconds is diddly, really. And because Flickr is so photocentric, I think its users will simply utilize the lame-o &#8220;movie&#8221; features on their still cameras for quickie moments.  Moving snapshots, literally. Video doodles. Jen Proctor calls them <a href="http://snipurl.com/25qhb  [www_flickr_com]" rel="nofollow">Voodles</a>.</p>
<p>I say &#8220;Yay, voodles!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda</title>
		<link>http://sarahatwood.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/video-on-flickr/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarahatwood.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-87</guid>
		<description>yeah, i kinda feel the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i kinda feel the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nimble2</title>
		<link>http://sarahatwood.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/video-on-flickr/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>nimble2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarahatwood.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I hope Flickr will have enough bandwidth to handle both photo&#039;s and vid&#039;s.
Remember how slow Twitter was last April and May</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Flickr will have enough bandwidth to handle both photo&#8217;s and vid&#8217;s.<br />
Remember how slow Twitter was last April and May</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
